JonesActQuestions.com registered users will be transferred as well.
|
|
|
| Jones Act Federal Circuits' & State Decisions - 5th Circuit | |||||||||
| Saturday, 16 January 2010 17:59 | |||||||||
|
Case Name: Crescent Towing & Salvage Co., v. M/V Belo Horizonte Date Decided: December 21, 2009 Court: U.S.D.C. E.D. Louisiana Judge: Judge Engelhardt Citation: 2009 WL 5171792 (E.D.La.) Background:
Issue: Held: The intervenors argued that they are available because such non-economic damages are recoverable if the surviving relatives were financially and physically dependent upon the seaman prior to his death. This Court, relying on Milesv. Apex Marine Corp. (498 U.S. 19), which determined that loss of society damages were not available under general maritime law in a wrongful death action brought by the mother of a Jones Act seaman stabbed to death while aboard a vessel docked in state territorial waters. The intervenors contended that Miles applied only to claims by nondependent survivors and this Court disagreed for the following reasons. For one, the Court in Miles did not expressly limit its decision to claims by nondependent survivors. Further, the Supreme Court in Miles looked to existing jurisprudence at the time Congress enacted the Jones Act. One such case, Vreeland (227 U.S. 33), a widow of a deceased employee could only recover for pecuniary loss in a FELA claim. This Court found no basis for concluding that claims by dependent relatives of a Jones Act seaman, asserted against a seaman's employer, are exempt from the proscription recognized in Miles against loss of society damages in wrongful death actions under general maritime law. Accordingly this Court granted Crescent's Motion for Summary Judgment Comment: Steve Gordon
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 4.0alpha3
!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."
|
Translate This Site