• Decrease 

font size
  • Reset 

font size to default
  • Increase 

font size
HOT NEWS
Home Jones Act Federal Circuits’ & State Decisions 5th Circuit Crescent Towing & Salvage Co. v. M/V BELO HORIZONTE

Please note all new Case Laws will be posted to OffshoreInjuries.com

JonesActQuestions.com registered users will be transferred as well.

PDF Print E-mail
Share
Jones Act Federal Circuits' & State Decisions - 5th Circuit
Saturday, 16 January 2010 17:59
Case Name: Crescent Towing & Salvage Co., v. M/V Belo Horizonte
Date Decided: December 21, 2009
Court: U.S.D.C. E.D. Louisiana
Judge: Judge Engelhardt
Citation: 2009 WL 5171792 (E.D.La.)

Background:
Eugent Ledet, while working on the Mississippi as a deckhand for Crescent Towing, was struck and killed by a parted mooring from the M/V BELO HORIZONTE. Crescent asserted claims against the BELO and siblings of the decedent intervened and filed claims against Crescent for relief under Jones Act and general maritime law. Crescent Towing sought dismissal of intervenors' claim of "loss of society" damages.

Issue:
Did this Court find that intervenors could recover for loss of society damages?  

Held:
Crescent argued that the surviving relatives of a seaman cannot recover loss of society damages because at the time of his death Mr. Ledet was a Jones Act seamans working in Louisiana territorial waters.

The intervenors argued that they are available because such non-economic damages are recoverable if the surviving relatives were financially and physically dependent upon the seaman prior to his death.

This Court, relying on Milesv. Apex Marine Corp. (498 U.S. 19), which determined that loss of society damages were not available under general maritime law in a wrongful death action brought by the mother of a Jones Act seaman stabbed to death while aboard a vessel docked in state territorial waters.

The intervenors contended that Miles applied only to claims by nondependent survivors and this Court disagreed for the following reasons.

For one, the Court in Miles did not expressly limit its decision to claims by nondependent survivors. Further, the Supreme Court in Miles looked to existing jurisprudence at the time Congress enacted the Jones Act. One such case, Vreeland (227 U.S. 33), a widow of a deceased employee could only recover for pecuniary loss in a FELA claim.

This Court found no basis for concluding that claims by dependent relatives of a Jones Act seaman, asserted against a seaman's employer, are exempt from the proscription recognized in Miles against loss of society damages in wrongful death actions under general maritime law.

Accordingly this Court granted Crescent's Motion for Summary Judgment

Comment:
Recovery for wrongful death under general maritime law and the Jones Act are limited to pecuniary losses only. That is, those losses that are actual such as loss of care, loss of support, and loss of services. Under the Jones Act, pain and suffering of the decedent after the injury and before death is recoverable.

Steve Gordon  

Comments
Search RSS
Only registered users can write comments!

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

 

Share it!

Translate This Site

English Arabic Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch Finnish French German Greek Hindi Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Spanish Swedish Catalan Filipino Hebrew Indonesian Latvian Lithuanian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Ukrainian Vietnamese Albanian Estonian Galician Hungarian Maltese Thai Turkish